Ambulance Staffing in Fire-Based EMS

Ambulance Staffing in Fire-Based EMS

By Alan Perry

December 25, 2013

The growing sophistication of pre-hospital medical care is driving the use of better research and the adoption of evidence based measures for patient care. It also relies on high quality data, and a greater degree of consistency and teamwork from providers, perhaps pushing the limits of the conventional two-man Medic. It may be time to break this tradition and begin deploying EMS assets the same way Fire assets are deployed, with a clear crew structure that is only to be broken up in extreme circumstances. I'm talking about a Medic Company, a senior EMS provider as the company officer and a ALS/BLS crew of two. Fielding this type of unit is both practical and revolutionary, allowing the team to perform at a higher level and reducing the instances of deploying multiple additional assets to "assist" them. Instead of a medic being a dreaded shift assignment a crew/officer would be assigned to it providing the same continuity and familiarity with the apparatus that engine assignments currently enjoy exclusively (this is called ownership).

The advantages of having more than one provider in the back of an ambulance for an ALS transport should be obvious and indisputable. Yet I still encounter resistance to the practice among my co-workers. I work in a Fire-based EMS environment with EMT-staffed ambulances and ALS providers on the engine companies. Not all engine companies have 4-person staffing, and they are not all in close proximity to a hospital. There are two possible outcomes depending on the Company Officer’s attitudes toward EMS services.

A)  The Company Officer moves all of the paramedics gear to the ambulance, takes one provider off the medic and moves his/her gear to the engine, the ALS provider rides the call in alone with the EMT driver. The engine company returns to service BLS, Once the patient is turned over and the unit is restocked the provider is brought back to his/her station, transfers their gear and returns to the engine.

B) Depending on the staffing level and proximity to the hospital; the Company Officer does not re-arrange personnel or gear, leaves an additional provider on the medic to assist with the "ALS" patient, follows the medic to the hospital remaining on the call, or goes out of service until the ALS provider is returned to the station.

These two options represent the cultural divide in thinking in an organization that puts Fire Protection above Patient Care. To better illustrate all of the variables let me break it down into Pros and Cons with a couple of stipulated facts:

*ALS patients are by definition more likely to need multiple and/or invasive procedures to assess, monitor and treat.

*The ability to record timely and accurate information aids in treatment. improves the accuracy of documentation and usable data collection.

     * One person cannot reliably perform multiple interventions, assessment, documentation and communications in a <15 minute transport.

To put this in its proper perspective we have to acknowledge that we are primarily an EMS service that provides Fire and Rescue services as well. We document the value of the property we save but rarely consider the value of the lives we impact. This may eventually change, like our ways of thinking.  let’s do what is best for the patient.

Thanks,

Alan